• Rowlett over coffee
  • About Ron
  • Contact
  • Poll
  • Notes
ROWLETT RAMBLINGS

A short break.

12/16/2014

0 Comments

 
Got a short break waiting on a phone call.  I thought I'd give you a preview on what I'm thinking for the next blog.  It will take some time, but I would like to re-visit the council meetings for The Villages, the restaurant land give away, and the temporary quarters for the library issue.  I want to form some opinion on how much the public was informed as decisions were made. 

Please don't think this is a witch hunt.  I have nothing against individual members of City Council, however I have taken three video courses required by the State of Texas because of committees I have sit on, or as a member of the City Council.  In all three videos it was stressed that the public should be informed.  Secrets should not be withheld, unless certain legal and "sensitive" issues are on the table.  Of course, "sensitive" is the key word.  Transparency is paramount in the eyes of the State of Texas.  Pretending transparency is not.

It is my opinion that discussing the spending of millions of dollars of taxpayer money is not "sensitive."  The steps that are taken to arrive at a decision of spending money should be shared with the citizens.  What I fear is that some meetings are "co-mingled," whereby information that should be shared with the citizens are being included in meetings with the city attorney under the guise of being "legal" or "sensitive"  issues.  By discussing the pros or cons of an issue, while in a "legal" meeting, the discussions are protected from public scrutiny and is therefore kept from the public.  Of course, this would be wrong.

There could be a possibility that the City Council does not want to be viewed as a "sleight of hand" council.   There is a possibility I am wrong.  I have no "proof."  Neither do you.  We are banned from such Executive Meetings.  In the absence of proof, one has to look at the patterns.  I want to study those patterns and I will post my findings and my opinion. 

I am aware of at least one council meeting in which a consultant was called into Executive Session to address the council on the zoning of  a residential request.  This consultant could not, or should not, be present for a "legally sensitive" meeting of city business.  The only purpose the consultant could have for being present would be the discussion of the zoning of the project.  That is definitely in the realm of the public.  I think the State of Texas would think so, also.  That is only one example.  Others follow.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    February 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.