I have been hopelessly hooked on the drama surrounding the Judge Kavanaugh appointment to the SCOTUS. I have hung on every word of testimony, including both for and against arguments. Nothing has captured my interest in recent years as much as this debate.
Being a conservative, it is easy to understand why I resented some of the commentary of the right leaning Senators. However, that doesn't mean I didn't have respect for some Democrat Senators. I had respect for Diane Feinstein, as well as many others. That doesn't mean I agree with them, which certainly includes Booker, Durbin, Schumer, and others. However, that respect now has been totally dashed. How can one human being, presumably intelligent, inflect so such damage and harm to another innocent family and career? The slander aimed at Judge Kavanaugh came from all corners of the Democrat Party and all it's far left followers. They didn't stop the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh, but they certainly dashed any respect I had for the Democrat Party. It is gone.
Not only were there 49 Senators against the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh, there were thousands of protesters marching in the streets, restaurants, and the halls of Congress, plus in the face of all Republican Senators. It seemed that every major city had protesters 24/7. Also, appearing in the news were photographs of protesters accepting money, presumably salaries, for marching and protesting. In addition, there were films of protesters being schooled by their leaders and practicing their shouts and slogans to be chanted whenever opportunity presented itself. It was kinda a University of Protest. The thought occurred to me, "Who is paying for all these protesters?" Also, who is paying for many left leaning organizations and websites? Even the most rudimentary research would reveal that the billionaire, George Soros, quickly surfaces. It is agreed that Soros is a very wealthy man. However, would you even guess how much it cost to raise such an army of so many protesters and still fund so many organizations? Is Soros so passionate about the future of the United States that he would spend the multi-millions necessary to fund the marching army that the far left puts into play, as well as other endeavors, including political races?
Mr. Soros loves the United States, but not the same way you do. You generally like being an American and much of what that stands for. Mr. Soros likes making the money that the U.S. permits, and wants to control the country. In fact, Mr. Soros made his money on the ashes of failed countries after WWII and the vastly reduced value of their currency. Mr. Soros could care less about George Washington, Daniel Boone, the Constitution, or the Bill of Rights. That's not his thing. He wants to own the USA and install a government that he controls. There's more money to be made in that plan. George Soros is an immigrant. His formative years growing up in Europe was in a totalitarian government. He couldn't give a flip about the U.S. Revolutionary War.
Now the question becomes, "How much money does Mr. Soros have? I will return to the question posed above. How much would Soros spend each month to keep his organization fully funded? Folks, it has to be an enormous amount of money. Now, we all know of the multi-billionaires in this country that donate large sums to their favorite charities and as much money as the law allows to their favorite political candidates. This money would pale in comparison to the money that Soros would have to spend each month. It probably wouldn't pay for George Soros' hot coffee stands for his protesters.
George Soros is a businessman. He is not going to spend money unless it has appropriate rewards......or, its not his money. He will take some controlled risks, as all business people do. However, would he take the risk of millions of dollars a month, gambling on the eventual "take over" of the USA? I doubt that. Soros is too smart for that.
So.........where's the money coming from? Is George Soros going to deplete his fortune? Nah. Who else benefits from an American failure in government? China? Russia? Is George Soros a conduit for Russian and Chinese money? Both China and Russia would much prefer to find an American conduit that make direct payments to protesters, websites, and clandestine political contributions rather than themselves. The American people, both right and left, would go ballistic if it was ever discovered China and Russia was funding a "new" U.S. revolution. Therefore, an American with reported billions of dollars of wealth is a logical choice for a "partner." It would be a clever subterfuge. It's okay for an American to fund protesters. However, not a totalitarian government. Of course, it would have to be an American that doesn't give a flip about the Constitution. Someone like George Soros.
So, just for discussion, let's say Russia and China are funding George Soros, and George is funding the many needs of protesters, websites, politicians, and hot coffee stands. If so, all the people that are protesting, supporting leftist ideas, promoting on websites, some Democrat politicians, and builders of coffee stands are unwitting agents of Russia and China. They are not smart enough to know they are being duped.
Can you think of anything more enjoyable to the leaders of Russia and China than the "new" revolutionary war being waged by the far left in this country? Some polls say about 40% of this country are okay with Socialism. That's an interesting number. Let's look at it.
It would appear that about 33% of the USA are Conservatives, 33% are Liberals, and 33% are Independents. It would only take a few Independents to cast their lot with the left to make the 40% above. Now let's look at another number. If you take an IQ test, your score will indicate where you are in relation to all others. If you score 100, half of the population will score higher than you, and half will score below you. That means 50% of the USA population will be dumber than the upper 50%. Where do you think most of the 40% that think Socialism is okay fits? If you look hard enough, you may find some IQ's in the 80s.
Does that mean that all leftists have IQ's of less than 100? Not at all. Let's say that 10% of the Leftist 40% are pretty darned smart. Let's say they know how to control the other 90% of the Leftists, and then sell some additional Independents on their glorious ways. Let's say they conned a full 50% of the 33% of the Independents. They now have enough to win all elections. The USA will then start moving pell mell to the left. Therefore, you now have 10% of the 33% of the leftists running the entire USA. Their brain dead followers will do whatever they have been told. They have been practicing their protests for years. Of course, with Leftists in control, there may be some layoffs in the protester's ranks. Actually, there will be layoffs in every business in the USA. You know, kinda like Venezuela.
Is the above scenario in place? I think so. In fact, if Hillery had won the last presidential election, I think the final step would have been in place to spend another eight years setting up the return of Barack Obama to the White House as a President for Life. You remember Obama, don't you? He's good friends of George Soros. Obama didn't retire to Chicago or Hawaii. He's in a house just a short distance from the White House. It keeps the moving expenses down.
However, there was a speed bump. That speed bump was Donald Trump. No one planned for that. Personally, I probably don't like Donald Trump all that well. I think he's arrogant and self centered. Not my type of guy. However, I sure do like the help he's given to my 401K, my business, and my house value because of the robust economy.
If you missed Senator Collins' speech on her reasons for voting in favor of Judge Kavanaugh, you missed a piece of history, and a refresher course on American civics. You should look for it. To not look for it will reveal your IQ.
Do I have proof of everything I've written above? Absolutely!!! My proof has the same credibility as the proof proving that Judge Havanaugh is a gang rapist and a beer drunk with an aggressive attitude, or he cries too much.
.
Being a conservative, it is easy to understand why I resented some of the commentary of the right leaning Senators. However, that doesn't mean I didn't have respect for some Democrat Senators. I had respect for Diane Feinstein, as well as many others. That doesn't mean I agree with them, which certainly includes Booker, Durbin, Schumer, and others. However, that respect now has been totally dashed. How can one human being, presumably intelligent, inflect so such damage and harm to another innocent family and career? The slander aimed at Judge Kavanaugh came from all corners of the Democrat Party and all it's far left followers. They didn't stop the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh, but they certainly dashed any respect I had for the Democrat Party. It is gone.
Not only were there 49 Senators against the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh, there were thousands of protesters marching in the streets, restaurants, and the halls of Congress, plus in the face of all Republican Senators. It seemed that every major city had protesters 24/7. Also, appearing in the news were photographs of protesters accepting money, presumably salaries, for marching and protesting. In addition, there were films of protesters being schooled by their leaders and practicing their shouts and slogans to be chanted whenever opportunity presented itself. It was kinda a University of Protest. The thought occurred to me, "Who is paying for all these protesters?" Also, who is paying for many left leaning organizations and websites? Even the most rudimentary research would reveal that the billionaire, George Soros, quickly surfaces. It is agreed that Soros is a very wealthy man. However, would you even guess how much it cost to raise such an army of so many protesters and still fund so many organizations? Is Soros so passionate about the future of the United States that he would spend the multi-millions necessary to fund the marching army that the far left puts into play, as well as other endeavors, including political races?
Mr. Soros loves the United States, but not the same way you do. You generally like being an American and much of what that stands for. Mr. Soros likes making the money that the U.S. permits, and wants to control the country. In fact, Mr. Soros made his money on the ashes of failed countries after WWII and the vastly reduced value of their currency. Mr. Soros could care less about George Washington, Daniel Boone, the Constitution, or the Bill of Rights. That's not his thing. He wants to own the USA and install a government that he controls. There's more money to be made in that plan. George Soros is an immigrant. His formative years growing up in Europe was in a totalitarian government. He couldn't give a flip about the U.S. Revolutionary War.
Now the question becomes, "How much money does Mr. Soros have? I will return to the question posed above. How much would Soros spend each month to keep his organization fully funded? Folks, it has to be an enormous amount of money. Now, we all know of the multi-billionaires in this country that donate large sums to their favorite charities and as much money as the law allows to their favorite political candidates. This money would pale in comparison to the money that Soros would have to spend each month. It probably wouldn't pay for George Soros' hot coffee stands for his protesters.
George Soros is a businessman. He is not going to spend money unless it has appropriate rewards......or, its not his money. He will take some controlled risks, as all business people do. However, would he take the risk of millions of dollars a month, gambling on the eventual "take over" of the USA? I doubt that. Soros is too smart for that.
So.........where's the money coming from? Is George Soros going to deplete his fortune? Nah. Who else benefits from an American failure in government? China? Russia? Is George Soros a conduit for Russian and Chinese money? Both China and Russia would much prefer to find an American conduit that make direct payments to protesters, websites, and clandestine political contributions rather than themselves. The American people, both right and left, would go ballistic if it was ever discovered China and Russia was funding a "new" U.S. revolution. Therefore, an American with reported billions of dollars of wealth is a logical choice for a "partner." It would be a clever subterfuge. It's okay for an American to fund protesters. However, not a totalitarian government. Of course, it would have to be an American that doesn't give a flip about the Constitution. Someone like George Soros.
So, just for discussion, let's say Russia and China are funding George Soros, and George is funding the many needs of protesters, websites, politicians, and hot coffee stands. If so, all the people that are protesting, supporting leftist ideas, promoting on websites, some Democrat politicians, and builders of coffee stands are unwitting agents of Russia and China. They are not smart enough to know they are being duped.
Can you think of anything more enjoyable to the leaders of Russia and China than the "new" revolutionary war being waged by the far left in this country? Some polls say about 40% of this country are okay with Socialism. That's an interesting number. Let's look at it.
It would appear that about 33% of the USA are Conservatives, 33% are Liberals, and 33% are Independents. It would only take a few Independents to cast their lot with the left to make the 40% above. Now let's look at another number. If you take an IQ test, your score will indicate where you are in relation to all others. If you score 100, half of the population will score higher than you, and half will score below you. That means 50% of the USA population will be dumber than the upper 50%. Where do you think most of the 40% that think Socialism is okay fits? If you look hard enough, you may find some IQ's in the 80s.
Does that mean that all leftists have IQ's of less than 100? Not at all. Let's say that 10% of the Leftist 40% are pretty darned smart. Let's say they know how to control the other 90% of the Leftists, and then sell some additional Independents on their glorious ways. Let's say they conned a full 50% of the 33% of the Independents. They now have enough to win all elections. The USA will then start moving pell mell to the left. Therefore, you now have 10% of the 33% of the leftists running the entire USA. Their brain dead followers will do whatever they have been told. They have been practicing their protests for years. Of course, with Leftists in control, there may be some layoffs in the protester's ranks. Actually, there will be layoffs in every business in the USA. You know, kinda like Venezuela.
Is the above scenario in place? I think so. In fact, if Hillery had won the last presidential election, I think the final step would have been in place to spend another eight years setting up the return of Barack Obama to the White House as a President for Life. You remember Obama, don't you? He's good friends of George Soros. Obama didn't retire to Chicago or Hawaii. He's in a house just a short distance from the White House. It keeps the moving expenses down.
However, there was a speed bump. That speed bump was Donald Trump. No one planned for that. Personally, I probably don't like Donald Trump all that well. I think he's arrogant and self centered. Not my type of guy. However, I sure do like the help he's given to my 401K, my business, and my house value because of the robust economy.
If you missed Senator Collins' speech on her reasons for voting in favor of Judge Kavanaugh, you missed a piece of history, and a refresher course on American civics. You should look for it. To not look for it will reveal your IQ.
Do I have proof of everything I've written above? Absolutely!!! My proof has the same credibility as the proof proving that Judge Havanaugh is a gang rapist and a beer drunk with an aggressive attitude, or he cries too much.
.
RSS Feed
