• Rowlett over coffee
  • About Ron
  • Contact
  • Poll
  • Notes
ROWLETT RAMBLINGS

To float a bond........or not.

3/30/2015

0 Comments

 
As we get closer to the Bond election, there seems to be more conversation about the Bond issue in general, and individual expenditures in particular.   That's okay.  That's the American way. 

For this little short exercise, I don't want to discuss the particulars.  We can do that on another post.  For example, I am having a hard time supporting the expenditure for a Public Service training facility.  Apparently, we have been renting time from Garland to rent their facility for training.  A number I would like to know is the cost of renting Garland's facility each year.  I don't have a clue what we spend for tower training each year for police and firemen.  However, for all expenditures we have to invest in, I  would always want to have no less than a 10 year payback.  That's roughly a 10% per year return on investment.  If we are spending $250,000 per year renting Garland's facility, it would roughly support a $2.5 million  capital improvement expenditure.  If we could rent that facility to other cities, that would speed up the payback, thus making the return on investment better.  I could support that bond issue.  But.......what if we don't spend $250,000 per year renting a facility?  That certainly changes the arithmetic.  If we can rent the facility to others, that would also change the arithmetic. 

I simply don't have enough info.  If Rowlett "officialdom" wants me to support the Safety training facility, I need more information.  In conversations with city leaders, I have said that they do not do a good job at communication with the citizens.  They already know how I feel about that. 

Each of the budgets, or allocations, of the proposed Bond program has it's own similar story.  Essentially, its what we get for the money. 

We all have to make our individual decisions on the details above.  However, the concept of using bond funding rather than cash flowing out of our tax revenue is quite another analysis. 

Just for purposes of discussion, lets say we need $20 million for "stuff."  We don't have $20 million.  We can get a loan.  That's what a bond issue is.  We are borrowing money from people who buy our bonds. 

It's the same as buying a car and getting a loan from a bank.  If you don't have $25K in the bank to buy the car, you get a loan to pay for the car.  Then you pay off the loan in accordance with the terms you can afford.

Notwithstanding the details mentioned above,  the bond issue is much the same as trading in our old car.  We have about $25 million of old bond debt that is retiring.  We have been making payments on that bond debt for many years.  That debt will be gone in a few months.  However, we now need some repairs.......about $25 million in repairs.  We can take the money that we now will have because we have retired the old bonds, and start making improvements.  Under this scenario, we will not incur any more bond debt.........but it will take us many, many years to make the repairs, because the absence of bond debt does not create the immediate cash to make all repairs at the same time.  So......there are two alternates:  1) raise the tax rate to get more cash sooner, or 2)  float new bond debt for $25 million. 

Let's say we're selfish.  Let's say we don't want the tax rate to go up and we want all the repairs done NOW.

That only leaves one option.  A new bond issue.  A good thing about a new bond issue is that the interest rate on bonds issued now have a substantially lower interest rate than earlier bonds.  I have mentioned this before.  I feel that Brian, the City Manager, should issue a public notice telling the public what the weighted average of the old bonds carry vs. the  interest rate of the new bond issue.  You should see a noticeable difference.   Our interest cost of $25 million of bond debt should go down considerably from the earlier bond debt.  That good for us and takes some upward pressure off the tax rate.  HOWEVER, other pressures may exert upward pressure on the tax rate.  That is a different discussion. 

The sale of cheaper bonds will provide the immediate $25 million to make all the proposed repairs as we could get to them.  And, our cost should still go down a little. 

It's just like buying a new car, except we're buying new streets, alleys and parks at a lower interest rate. 

You do not save money by rejecting the bond issue.  You only change to a pocket that never has enough money in it.  
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    February 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.